<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BONUS CONTENT: Sky Turnaround</title>
	<atom:link href="http://runnersuniverse.com/2010/03/bonus-content-sky-turnaround/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://runnersuniverse.com/2010/03/bonus-content-sky-turnaround/</link>
	<description>For all things related to Runners, the sci-fi comic by Sean Wang</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://runnersuniverse.com/2010/03/bonus-content-sky-turnaround/comment-page-1/#comment-5319</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runnersuniverse.com/?p=1639#comment-5319</guid>
		<description>Good job, design wise and all, as always. But I&#039;m rather cold on Sky&#039;s head wear, it makes her look even more like a faerie. (Plus, personally, I think head wear on women is sacrilegious. Funnily, in general they don&#039;t think the same!)

Quilting is presumably done to keep loose material such as feather down in place without creating too much of a cold spot (thermal bridge) by displaced material. Modern (synthetic or natural) fill sleeping bags can be box sewn, having cloth pieces fitted to make compartments instead, with even less loss of heat. 

But generally such solutions lower the insulation capability and makes no sense for sewn textiles out of hollow fiber material. Maybe we should put that down as an example of Sky&#039;s fashion sense overpowering her sense of practicality.

OT: These view references is an exploration in psychology. I had no idea that female figures lacking arms were more bothering to my psyche than men. Go figure! ..., uh, or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job, design wise and all, as always. But I&#8217;m rather cold on Sky&#8217;s head wear, it makes her look even more like a faerie. (Plus, personally, I think head wear on women is sacrilegious. Funnily, in general they don&#8217;t think the same!)</p>
<p>Quilting is presumably done to keep loose material such as feather down in place without creating too much of a cold spot (thermal bridge) by displaced material. Modern (synthetic or natural) fill sleeping bags can be box sewn, having cloth pieces fitted to make compartments instead, with even less loss of heat. </p>
<p>But generally such solutions lower the insulation capability and makes no sense for sewn textiles out of hollow fiber material. Maybe we should put that down as an example of Sky&#8217;s fashion sense overpowering her sense of practicality.</p>
<p>OT: These view references is an exploration in psychology. I had no idea that female figures lacking arms were more bothering to my psyche than men. Go figure! &#8230;, uh, or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Wang</title>
		<link>http://runnersuniverse.com/2010/03/bonus-content-sky-turnaround/comment-page-1/#comment-4506</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runnersuniverse.com/?p=1639#comment-4506</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s generally a judgment call, but I want to draw whatever will be the most useful for me as reference. In this case (and in most instances), I can easily tell what the arm will look like from the side, based on the front and back views. What might be more informative on a side view is what that arm would be blocking if I did draw it in. So here, the arm wouldn&#039;t be terribly useful, or at least not as useful as seeing the how the front of Sky&#039;s outfit meets the back and forms the seam on the side, a detail that isn&#039;t shown in either the front or back views.

For another hypothetical example, if a character carries his gun at his waist on the side, drawing the arm in would obscure that. So I might forego the arm in order to show the gun and holster.

Or maybe I&#039;ve just seen too many Star Wars movies and like characters with arms chopped off. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s generally a judgment call, but I want to draw whatever will be the most useful for me as reference. In this case (and in most instances), I can easily tell what the arm will look like from the side, based on the front and back views. What might be more informative on a side view is what that arm would be blocking if I did draw it in. So here, the arm wouldn&#8217;t be terribly useful, or at least not as useful as seeing the how the front of Sky&#8217;s outfit meets the back and forms the seam on the side, a detail that isn&#8217;t shown in either the front or back views.</p>
<p>For another hypothetical example, if a character carries his gun at his waist on the side, drawing the arm in would obscure that. So I might forego the arm in order to show the gun and holster.</p>
<p>Or maybe I&#8217;ve just seen too many Star Wars movies and like characters with arms chopped off. <img src='http://runnersuniverse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShadowWing Tronix</title>
		<link>http://runnersuniverse.com/2010/03/bonus-content-sky-turnaround/comment-page-1/#comment-4438</link>
		<dc:creator>ShadowWing Tronix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runnersuniverse.com/?p=1639#comment-4438</guid>
		<description>Out of curiosity, why do all the side views seem to be missing an arm? (Although it makes sense for Bocce. :D )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity, why do all the side views seem to be missing an arm? (Although it makes sense for Bocce. <img src='http://runnersuniverse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traffic Ultimatum Update Plus Video Review &#124; Traffic Ultimatum</title>
		<link>http://runnersuniverse.com/2010/03/bonus-content-sky-turnaround/comment-page-1/#comment-4422</link>
		<dc:creator>Traffic Ultimatum Update Plus Video Review &#124; Traffic Ultimatum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runnersuniverse.com/?p=1639#comment-4422</guid>
		<description>[...] runnersuniverse.com &#187; Archive &#187; BONUS CONTENT: Sky Turnaround [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] runnersuniverse.com &raquo; Archive &raquo; BONUS CONTENT: Sky Turnaround [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

